I had a hard time debating with myself if I wanted to post this or not. It's a topic that gets beaten to death so often you'd think it would be reasonable enough and just die but then, it's not a reasonable topic. I also thought about putting out a "special" post last Friday because it was Gun Violence Awareness Day. But then I thought, the last thing you needed was me throwing in a nickel's worth of my two cents on that day.
There is no doubt there is gun violence all over the place. Every week brings new mass shootings to the national news and local newscasts are filled with stories of shootings every day. In my greater metro area, between Friday and Sunday of this past weekend, four people lost their lives to gun violence and several others injured. There have been less than a handful of days a shooting hadn't been reported here since a local mass shooting at an AirBnB party the night before Easter, including one when the victim was a one year old sitting in the back of a car targeted in a drive by shooting. If you're not aware of the gun violence in the United States, then you're really too stupid to be reading this.
So let's summarize, all the people who think the Second Amendment gives you the right to own a gun, you're wrong.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
That was, is, and forever will be until its repeal, all the Second Amendment says. Nobody can deny you the possession of a weapon used to defend the STATE (i.e. the USA) if done so needed as a part of a REGULATED military effort). Considering we have a perfectly acceptable armed forces system now that was not in place in 1789, there is no longer a reason to guarantee anybody to right to maintain a weapon. But even if there was, the right is only protected when used to defend the country. Not to hunt, not to target shoot, not to defend oneself, not to forget you have it in your carryon bag at the airport, not to settle suburban hedge trimming disputes, and not to commit mass, or even single murder.
I am nothing if I cannot look at both sides, so let's look. Gun control advocates point to the numbers, the most often quoted is that in the U. S. of A. in 2022, there were 45,222 gun related deaths (I don't know why but that's the last year the total is available). Gun advocates will say, "Woah, woah, woah. Over half of those were suicides." And they are right. Fifty-four percent of the 45,000+ deaths, or about 24,000 were suicides. They don't mention, but I will, that 2% (a little over 900). That leaves 43% or 19,455 people intentionally killed by another American presumably exercising his or her right to own a gun as part of a regulated militia to protect the country. That is over 19,000 people who were victims of gun violence.
The gun advocate will say that of those 45,222, almost 25,000 people were going to die anyway. (Maybe, maybe not, but let's stick with saving the 19,000 for now.) How does that compare. Forget deaths due to cancer, heart disease, train derailments, bad lettuce, or anything else not gun related. Let's compare that to those who are participating in protecting the country in the modern well-regulated armed forces system. And let's not just look at 2020. Let's look at the entire twenty-first century to date. So far, in all armed conflicts since 2001, there have been 7,075 fatalities, about an average of 36 per year. That's 18,964 LESS deaths due to defending the state in a well regulated military than deaths due to gun violence. Per year.
I could stop there but somebody is going to say, "But I just use my gun for hunting or target shooter or protecting my family. Not to randomly shoot somebody." First, let's ignore the protect your family argument because if you have a gun for protection and you are not planning on shooting somebody if you need protecting, then why do you have it? Then for the hunters and sportsmen (sportspeople?), you don't need an assault rifle to shoot a deer, nor a 60 or 100 shot magazine to fire 20 times at a paper target. And really, you don't need any ammunition at all until you're ready to hunt or competitively shoot. I recall reading an argument to not regulate guns but, given that the Second Amendment is quiet on what you load into those arms, to ban ammunition. Maybe not such a horrible idea.
Consider this. For years, I shot skeet recreationally. (I'm not sure why because you just can't make a good meal out of them, but even so ... anyway) Every Sunday afternoon I could be found at the rod and gun club blasting clay pigeons into oblivion. I travelled to and from the club with my unloaded shot gun and at the club bought only the amount of ammunition I would use for the afternoon's festivities and then go home with an unloaded shotgun. They say never to store you gun and ammunition in the same place. Mine were separated by about 15 miles. I'd call that safe and responsible.
It always amazes me when people toss around the word "Right" in their argument for ... well, for anything. Gun rights, women's rights, students' rights, union rights ... like they have a right to do whatever they please and find somewhere in the Constitution to defend it. And there are a lot of guaranteed rights in the US Constitution. But in each case there are also qualifiers and limitations. Rights are guaranteed. Unregulated license is not. We are a nation obsessed with the Rights without bearing the Responsibilities.
Now I'm not going to say we should or should not repeat the Second Amendment, although I will say before anybody tries to use the Second Amendment as a justification for killing 19,000 people this year, they really need to see a good psychiatrist.
Sorry, no cute picture for this post. I couldn't seem to put one together to celebrate so much death.
No comments:
Post a Comment