Art is about capturing a feeling
T'was a few days before the Inside Out 2 movie was released. The husband was making me watch a thought-provoking interview. (He knew the distractions at hand on a beautiful summer evening. I needed to watch bees flit, deer graze, geese squawk, herons fish, dogs bark. As I cradled my evening cup of tea wondering when to get out on my evening walk, he swooped in. "Won't take longer than the time it takes to gulp your tea" he said cheerfully and I gave him a skeptical look. I do not take ½ an hour to drink tea.)
Anyway, in the interview, they spoke of suffering and how one needed that pain in order to emote well as an artist. It is not a new sentiment. I remember listening to an interview by J K Rowling or Stephen King (I don't remember which) that one needs to have had a sufficiently terrible time as a teenager if they were to write anything worth writing at all.
Problems Are Steady
I am not sure I agree with that. Suffering can be acute, agonizing and astonishing in its effects even as adults. In fact, much like our boggarts tend to change through life, so too does our ability to imagine and empathize, don't they? Also, for many of us, problems tend to be a steady stream in life - we get jittery and nervous if there aren't any. Can it really be that we are having a perfectly peaceful time - do you think something awful is going to happen? This can't be true. Maybe I should call the children, see if they are okay. Oh - what about the old parents, the siblings, the nieces, the nephews, our friends, colleagues, neighbors? Work? No? All well - is this really so?
Then, you tend to the heart like an overwrought bee in summer and soothe it down. "Yes my dear - there really are flowers everywhere! Believe it or not, managing plenty is as much work as managing long distances for some nectar. Just relax, will you?!" Problems like to steadily hum along like background music. We all need problems at some level, do we not? At least that's what I tell myself when things get a bit clammy.
Does Art Capture Emotion?
So, does art need to be about capturing emotion - whether through direct suffering or empathetic suffering? I thought Starry Night by Vincent Van Gogh was brilliant because it captured the frenzied anxiety of the artist's mind. But, was that what everyone thought? How about those moments of bliss, joy, anger, disgust, repulsion, serenity, contentment, love, and all the ones that Pandora so generously released from her little box of troubles. Hope?
A couple of days later when we went to watch Inside Out 2, we sat spellbound as the movie captured Anxiety's frenzy so perfectly in this animated movie. How Riley's imagination spewed up every little thing that could go wrong and let her sense of self develop into a skewed sense echoing, "I am not good enough!" was tragic and Oh! So Well Done!
When you observe a piece of art, do you concentrate on how it makes you feel? Or do you appreciate it for the skill of the artist?
P G Wodehouse on Art
What's a post on Art without one of my favorite quotes by P G Wodehouse - only I feel a little like Bertie Wooster himself writing this - it has something to do with a painting looking like 'summer blew up in your face' - but I cannot remember it. Gemini threw up its hands and said: P G Wodehouse is not an art critic, but an humorous writer, without a trace of irony. I did spend an enjoyable few hours since then
(a) looking for the quote and reading several good ones on the internet,
(b) perusing my own PG Wodehouse collection opening books at random looking for the quote
Which is to say that I had a marvelous time, but still not find the quote. If anyone remembers it, please let me know. But the art of remembering the quote and imagining the painting itself made me laugh, made me feel joyous, so by that standard, it is already a piece of art. What do you think?
I would love to hear all the different ways in which you appreciate Art.
No comments:
Post a Comment